Mon premier blog

Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change David J. Howarth, Aletta J. Norval, Yannis Stavrakakis
Publisher:

In this study I will employ a qualitative methodology; the discourse historical approach (DHA) which is a variant of the Critical Discourse Analysis will be used as the methodological framework. Via employing the theory of hegemony. Discourse theory rejects any possibility of an ethical or political universalism upon which to base society and thus discards the Marxist conception of proletarian universal emanicipatory power. Laclau suggests that the major political dilemma facing the In D. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Stavrakakis (Eds.), Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, hegemonies and social change (pp. The DHA argues In addition to that, in my paper, I will try to answer the central question I have set: Why does Zaman sometimes have overlapping discourses with that of Hurriyet despite being the owner of the anti-hegemonic discourse? According to Lewis (2007), a set of common assumptions has governed the analysis of ethnicity in Nigerian politics and society. New Theories of Discourse (Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change) Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Introducing discourse theory and political analysis. Stavrakakis (Eds.), Discourse theory and Political analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. First, ethnic identification is presumed to be the most salient and consistent source of social identity in Nigeria.